Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:32:22 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available Message-ID: <op.wa6xb8ki34t2sn@cr48.lan> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=9Gyy88MjyZZRDO_X6G=hRrfoqjeOrm4B6cHaudnZJ_Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-VmokUV8t3W4CueZuiZC7e=FuVtFu1jq54V_NpRc79-3QG=w@mail.gmail.com> <ACA5E377-BFF9-4C1D-8499-A8003FFE79B3@cl.cam.ac.uk> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A3@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <CAJ-Vmo=9Gyy88MjyZZRDO_X6G=hRrfoqjeOrm4B6cHaudnZJ_Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:26:23 -0500, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > I must be thinking of our mailer trick then? > > I know i've seen it somewhere before. > > Alternatives sounds fun though? > I've seen several discussions on the bsd lists with everyone against the debian alternatives way. I don't know the history but I don't think it has much support. I assume it has to do with binaries passing through /etc via symlinks. I don't personally have much of an opinion on this.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wa6xb8ki34t2sn>