Date: 29 Nov 2000 22:28:07 -0700 From: Jason R Mastaler <jason@mastaler.com> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NetBSD package system features Message-ID: <x7wvdmav14.fsf@aguirre.la.mastaler.com> In-Reply-To: Peter Pentchev's message of "Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:21:42 %2B0200" References: <00112811292900.19785@nightshade> <20001128231806.A318@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <200011282208.eASM8lO60591@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20001129002142.B318@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> writes: > I might even go so far in my enthusiasm as to actually draft some > kind of update utility (I do not feel all that warm and fuzzy about > mucking up /usr/ports/Mk makefiles :) I don't understand this. It seems more useful to create an "update" make target instead of detaching the functionality into yet another (un)maintained utility. What does Bruce and others think about this? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?x7wvdmav14.fsf>