Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:42:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org> Cc: Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org>, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/share/sgml header.ent www/en/layout/css layout.css www/en index.xsl Message-ID: <20061204084054.W69580@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20061204074206.GE2564@elvandar.org> References: <200612031944.kB3Ji1Ma081957@repoman.freebsd.org> <45732F01.6040204@FreeBSD.org> <20061203223415.D69580@fledge.watson.org> <20061204074206.GE2564@elvandar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Remko Lodder wrote: > Well do notice that I am not against the link itself, I am against > the way it was being done. doceng@ is not the proper entity for > these kind of things, they coordinate the development of documentation > and they assign/accept new commitbits. They cannot be seen as the > portmgr@ or core@ teams. The proper way is and should be by contacting > the webmasters mailinglist on www@ and ask for the change there. This > way the webmasters team can either commit it and/or do additional > things. > > As the "harm" already had been done, we should not remove the link > now (esp. with your reasoning), but I request that this will be > done the proper way the next time, and we should (www/doc team) really > consider some kind of guideline for new links (To avoid the overload > of information we once had with the old site). > > Does that sound reasonable to you Robert? I think we're in agreement. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061204084054.W69580>