Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:48:58 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Ports Management Team <portmgr@freebsd.org>, Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net> Subject: Re: Plans for making MAKE_JOBS_SAFE the default? Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmx0bJcW-iP_a8B3y9x9T%2BxF0MNsW55ciJJOnKPfQEMSA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CABzXLYNQBVZAkL%2B-HMUVduzq_UKLEjbQFE4zn_KhCBE3agX-Hw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgkjxAmFjr=qp%2BDC83AqvY4CMXVn5=CQCfQi_aKn3bnoRQ@mail.gmail.com> <50463F7F.2030502@shatow.net> <CABzXLYNQBVZAkL%2B-HMUVduzq_UKLEjbQFE4zn_KhCBE3agX-Hw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 September 2012 12:13, Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> wrote: > 2012/9/4 Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net>: >>> My proposal: >>> - start an exp-run with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS set >>> - mark all new failures with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE >>> - flip the default right after the 9.1 release. ... It has been months since I sent this mail without any official reply whatsoever. At this point the exp-run machines are down and not likely to return in the *near* future. Can I propose that this flag be flipped without an exp-run and fix the fallout? It has been widely tested and has had exp-runs in the past. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmx0bJcW-iP_a8B3y9x9T%2BxF0MNsW55ciJJOnKPfQEMSA>