Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:41:03 +0100 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E4chler_Philippe?= <pmaechler@glattnet.ch> Subject: Re: ARP Messages Message-ID: <200802261541.03781.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <006601c87871$186e79b0$3202a8c0@glattwerk.local> References: <006601c87871$186e79b0$3202a8c0@glattwerk.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 13:14:11 M=E4chler Philippe wrote:
> %netstat -rn
> Routing tables
>
> Internet:
> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use
> Netif Expire
> 192.168.2 192.168.3.254 UGS 0 8209
> bge1
> 192.168.3 link#2 UC 0 0
> bge1
These routes look fishy. It shouldn't have a route for 192.168.2 cause it's=
=20
nowhere defined, so it should go through default, not through bge1. Any=20
chance a machine on your network has 192.168.2/24 and publishing it, where =
it=20
should be 80.242 something?
Try route delete 192.168.2.0 and see if it clears.
=2D-=20
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200802261541.03781.fbsd.questions>