Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 19:34:24 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@tandon.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Policy on hard coded paths? Message-ID: <20090522233423.GA27203@shepherd.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <4d7dd86f0905221459t5fd1c5afyeb52eca42b9ad0c2@mail.gmail.com> References: <4d7dd86f0905221459t5fd1c5afyeb52eca42b9ad0c2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 May 2009, David N wrote: > I'm currently very interested in Zimbra, but unfortunately the > developers decided on a "Fat Package" approach so everything is > bundled directly into the source. It also has its path hard coded into > /opt/zimbra. > > If someone manages to create a patch for it to be compiled and running > successfully on FreeBSD. Does it have a chance to be included into the > Ports tree even though its path is hard coded? It has a chance. And it would likely be patched to circumvent the hard-coding, and comply as much as possible with hier(7). -- Sahil Tandon <sahil@tandon.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090522233423.GA27203>