Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:56:58 -0000 From: <net@wsf.at> To: <philip.reynolds@rfc-networks.ie>, <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE / NATD + IPFW + keep-state Message-ID: <200207301256.g6UCuwY08741@www.wsf.at> In-Reply-To: <20020730133246.A18016@rfc-networks.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Philip Reynolds <philip.reynolds@rfc-networks.ie> schrieb: > "Crist J. Clark" <crist.clark@attbi.com> 19 lines of wisdom included: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:47:58PM +0000, Philip Reynolds wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm having a few problems with using natd and ipfw. > > > > > > Originally, I was having serious serious problems trying to get > > > stateful firewalling working with NAT. > > > > This is a FAQ, > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi? fetch=13412+0+archive/2002/freebsd-net/20020217.freebsd-net > > using ``via'' helped along the way and the setup is currently > working. > > What was needed was a specification of the public interface _only_ > for the ``NATD'' rule in conjunction with a specification of the > private interface _only_ for the ``keep-state'' rule. > > Unfortunately tweaking my rules before, I must have missed this > combination, although I'm not sure how. > > Thanks for to Crist and Boris for their help. > Hi Philip, Could you send your working ruleset to the list ? It would help others in the future... Thomas Wolf To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207301256.g6UCuwY08741>