Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:11:05 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <gaijin.k@ovi.com>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Re: Console options for legacy-free mini-itx server? Message-ID: <201011181711.05440.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <985E77DE-BFC9-4186-8493-36C63C62CE29@bigpond.net.au> References: <20101115045549.GB96011@johnny.reilly.home> <201011180759.39129.jhb@freebsd.org> <985E77DE-BFC9-4186-8493-36C63C62CE29@bigpond.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 4:07:27 pm Andrew Reilly wrote: > Hi John, > > On 18/11/2010, at 23:59 , John Baldwin wrote: > > > You used devinfo -v, so it shows the devices that exist even if they failed > > to attach. Try just using 'devinfo' and seeing if est1 still shows up. > > OK, you're right: running without -v shows only est0: > > nexus0 > apic0 > ram0 > acpi0 > cpu0 > acpi_perf0 > est0 > p4tcc0 > cpufreq0 > cpu1 > p4tcc1 > cpufreq1 > acpi_button0 > pcib0 > <...> > > Is est. involved in the reboot question? Probably not. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011181711.05440.jhb>