Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:15:48 +0200
From:      Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com>
To:        Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
Cc:        freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New UMASS driver available for testing
Message-ID:  <20061003171548.GA1325@roadrunner.q.local>
In-Reply-To: <200610010944.04652.hselasky@c2i.net>
References:  <200609171214.49165.hselasky@c2i.net> <20060930152928.GB1441@roadrunner.q.local> <200610010944.04652.hselasky@c2i.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Saturday 30 September 2006 17:29, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> > As you can see, performance increased by roughly 10%, but system time
> > increased about 300% :(
> >
> > I hope this info was useful to you and am looking forward to seeing your
> > reworked USB system hit the tree soon!
> 
> The extra time used is due to an inline wait loop in the code, to make things 
> simple.


505856+0 records in
505856+0 records out
258998272 bytes transferred in 1771.034516 secs (146241 bytes/sec)
dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/zero bs=$i  0.20s user 3.10s system 0% cpu 29:31.05 total
63232+0 records in
63232+0 records out
258998272 bytes transferred in 775.213552 secs (334099 bytes/sec)
dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/zero bs=$i  0.01s user 0.41s system 0% cpu 12:55.23 total
7904+0 records in
7904+0 records out
258998272 bytes transferred in 650.920062 secs (397896 bytes/sec)
dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/zero bs=$i  0.00s user 0.07s system 0% cpu 10:50.93 total
988+0 records in
988+0 records out
258998272 bytes transferred in 641.615133 secs (403666 bytes/sec)
dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/zero bs=$i  0.00s user 0.03s system 0% cpu 10:41.63 total
123+1 records in
123+1 records out
258998272 bytes transferred in 641.612930 secs (403667 bytes/sec)
dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/zero bs=$i  0.00s user 0.04s system 0% cpu 10:41.63 total

Looks good to me, CPU usage is back to the old USB stack, but
performance is up roughly 10%. Nice.

So, when is that stuff going to finally hit -CURRENT? Any schedule?

Ulrich Spoerlein
-- 
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
> >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061003171548.GA1325>