Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 18:54:18 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gdb 4.17 Message-ID: <19990326185418.B86672@relay.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903262023170.25868-100000@picnic.mat.net>; from Chuck Robey on Fri, Mar 26, 1999 at 08:24:31PM -0500 References: <19990326170514.A86355@relay.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903262023170.25868-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > A contribifed EGCS is ready to go. See the March mail archives for the > > Last I looked, you had that area kind of full of test releases, > magnifying the size several times over. Have you cut it down yet ... > I'm asking about how many megs is it now, it was well over 100 I think > before, right? Not really full of test releases, just versions 1.1.1, 1.1.2-prerelease2, 1.1.2-prerelease3, and 1.1.2 on vendor branches. The diffs between them aren't really that large at all. Many files are the same in 1.1.1 and 1.1.2. But EGCS does encompass GCC/libg++(the parts that survived the standardization)/STL/G77(fortran)/test suites so it is much larger than src/contrib/gcc/. The test suites do take a large chunk of space. I don't know if we should commit the test suites to our tree, or not. Regression tests are good to have, but the space..... Also, I still have the G77 bits in my EGCS repository until it is decided if FORTRAN lives in the base tree, or as a port. I don't care either way about the G77 issue, and will do as others tell me about it. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990326185418.B86672>