Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Apr 1997 11:55:25 -0600
From:      Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>
To:        hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? 
Message-ID:  <199704091755.LAA08240@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 1997 10:35:09 CDT." <199704091535.KAA01745@compound.east.sun.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

> I beg to differ.  It is the only set supporting SDRAM!  It seems one's
> choice is between a fast small memory system and a slow large memory
> one.  An unpleasant tradeoff, to be sure, but I would expect anyone
> who intends not to add more than 64MB RAM to the current generation
> motherboard to prefer the SDRAM support.

the numbers I've seen for SDRAM suggest there isn't much gained in REAL WORLD 
situations.  Can't remember the specifics but do remember thinking at the time
that I apparently wasn't missing anything..

just my 2cents worth...
--
Steve Passe	| powered by 
smp@csn.net	|            Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704091755.LAA08240>