Date: 02 Apr 1999 18:40:29 -0600 From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: Ladavac Marino <mladavac@metropolitan.at> Cc: "'Chuck Robey'" <chuckr@mat.net>, "Alton, Matthew" <Matthew.Alton@anheuser-busch.com>, DL-ADM <DLADM@anheuser-busch.com>, "'Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG'" <Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: AIX going BSD Message-ID: <86zp4qo7sy.fsf@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: Ladavac Marino's message of "Thu, 1 Apr 1999 10:54:03 %2B0200" References: <97A8CA5BF490D211A94F0000F6C2E55D097586@s-lmh-wi-900.corpnet.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> AIX is *not* doing anything at all outside the usual, and it would, >> in fact, be remarkable (and outside the expected norm) if you >> *didn't* find some BSD code in it. Why don't you go look at, oh, >> Hewlett Packard, or some other mainstream vendor? > [ML] I'm afraid you are not getting it. > I was actually commending IBM/AIX on its good taste in choice of > source bits (i.e. ours and NetBSD's) and actually acknowledging that (by > not removing the RCS id lines). I've always been amused that AIX left the fortunes in the file that disparage IBM. Cheers, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zp4qo7sy.fsf>