Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 01:31:44 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> Cc: dg@Root.COM, Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>, jdw@wwwi.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IP bugs in FreeBSD 2.1.5 Message-ID: <199610170831.BAA01189@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Oct 1996 10:51:11 %2B0300." <Pine.BSF.3.91.961017104643.17620A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From The Desk Of Narvi : > > > On Wed, 16 Oct 1996, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > > I think that it will be wise to release 2.2 soon. It is getting uncomfortab le > > for both users or ISPs and developers. > > Soon? If something even remotedly stable is to be released, then IMHO a > new branch should be created soon and 2.2.0-prerelease-stable put up for > testing for say ~1.5 - 2 months? If people can say yeah, it's stable, it > has been out for quite some time then we can make the release and be > comfort - most people will see long uptimes and the image of FreeBSD as a > stable OS will remain. > > Sander > I got to admit that 2.2 is not that stable at the moment : no crashes over here. But of course it needs more exposure as a "stable" release branch my point is that is not currently considered so and hence it will continue to be so till the core teams deems that their goals have been met and the "branch" is considerd "stable". At any rate, this is not a big issue with me since I don't have a 2.1.5 system nor the personal resources to support 2.1.5 8) Cheers, Amancio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610170831.BAA01189>