Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 10:01:39 +1100 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970327100025.18394q-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970326173451.00b61420@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, dennis wrote: > At 09:48 AM 3/27/97 +1100, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > >On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, dennis wrote: > > > >> You guys ever think of doing a patch release (like a single tarball with > >> the changes) for those of us that spent 2 days setting up 2.2R? > > > >Yes, I have. To upgrade to 2.2.1, I'll be fetching bin/*, unpacking, rm > >-rf etc dev, repack, then untar with --unlink and -p. > > Are the only changes in bin? What about the source to the kernel modules? > dont you need ssys also? Yes, you are right. The 2.2.1 README clearly states that there are kernel changes also, esp the 2940 code. The principle remains the same - /etc does not get clobbered. Danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970327100025.18394q-100000>