Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 15:20:09 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Joe Greco <jgreco@solaria.sol.net> Cc: dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Stability (was Re: another victim..) Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970220151717.12974A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199702200134.TAA09095@solaria.sol.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Feb 1997, Joe Greco wrote: > > I've been running 2.2 since it was "current" with apache for 5 months and > > it's *never* fallen over. The longest uptime was around 65 days, but that > > was because it was taken down for kernel updates. > > > > The web serving load isn't very high though, httpd is generating about > > 30MB of logs every month. > > I don't think I've seen any instances of 2.2 truly falling over, either, > although there are times where it seems to "pause" during heavy VM activity > that doesn't happen with 2.1.X. It's been hard to quantify precisely. > > I am not trying to say that 2.2 is bad, I'm just saying that its track > record (no matter how good) is not very long. I didn't think you were actually, I was just adding a data point. Your advice is sound, I live on the edge a little bit picking out stable builds and installing them in production sites that handle moderate loads. Regards, Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.970220151717.12974A-100000>