Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:20:28 -0700 From: "DOROVSKOY,IGOR (A-Portsmouth,ex1)" <igor_dorovskoy@agilent.com> To: 'Storms of Perfection' <gary@outloud.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Clock Granularity (kernel option HZ) Message-ID: <0D9185CE635BD511ACA50090277A6FCF1359AF@axcs18.cos.agilent.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I vote for HZ=100000. What would be our test plan? Igor. >I'm going to benchmark different network senarious with different options >to see what I can get, and what works best. If someone wants to help me >out, I could maybe write up a article about it? >> I've used a large collection of PCs running somewhat real-time network >> analysis with a HZ set at 5000Hz with absolutely no ill effects (this >> was with P-III-450's) >> >> using HZ=10000 was outside of the possibilities of the machines. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0D9185CE635BD511ACA50090277A6FCF1359AF>