Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:11:50 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libexecinfo? Message-ID: <20130918171150.GA68789@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <l1cm1v$7aq$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <l1cm1v$7aq$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:57:35PM +0000, Walter Hurry wrote: > We had a recent issue with libiconv now being included in base, thus=20 > rendering the port superfluous. >=20 > Does a similar situation exist with libexecinfo? I don't seem to need the= =20 > port on on 10.0-ALPHA1 r255587, and htop and ruby both build quite=20 > happily without it. The library is /usr/lib/libexecinfo.so.1. >=20 libexecinfo in base is exactly the same as the on from ports, so it should = be a change that doesn't require any manual operations. regards, Bapt --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlI53tYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez+qgCfXJS9NdmJPHkflUKtffIvoNKJ oTgAoLxmGJU9LPzKwnMWjAxpy5B6sZTY =YxG5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130918171150.GA68789>