Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:08:16 +0200
From:      Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>
To:        s m <sam.gh1986@gmail.com>
Cc:        Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Olivier Nicole <olivier.nicole@cs.ait.ac.th>, sthaug@nethelp.no
Subject:   Re: how define network with mask 8 for dhcp server?
Message-ID:  <CAPS9%2BStCqGx20rUWyUkQOUX44po6speAoD0tPmc3YtWNvbxa3Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA_1SgGck7Tne56p2yWS261rc6trR1QiDJ1kk-BbcfbDk5yRCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAA_1SgHWSwm62xsXzas7W0SOtDoLL-0o85%2BdqGeLzDbhb=KWQg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2Bg%2BBvhvo0Tx0XjyGw7fTV=aribbev1BEh8cUsVLWjxD2d62pg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA_1SgGJdt8h3-5naE32PuuWxX26NhiXietyOsh20Lf73pkrVQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130812.071303.74723582.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAPS9%2BStfwq309h641hiTGnav=bTWdr5HWdz4evpMqTx6mfx%2BgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA_1SgGck7Tne56p2yWS261rc6trR1QiDJ1kk-BbcfbDk5yRCQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, thats another problem :) At least dhcpd doesn't crash and could
deliver the full range of a /8 network.

Best regards
Andreas


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:00 AM, s m <sam.gh1986@gmail.com> wrote:

> thanks Andreas, but it can not help me. it uses all my RAM memory yet:(
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:13 AM, <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote:
>>
>>> > you're right Olivier, but you know i have a user interface for dhcp
>>> and i
>>> > should handle all the network and ranges which are inserted by user and
>>> > logically are true. network with mask 8, logically is true and having
>>> > million available ip address, too.
>>> > i just wanna know if there is any solution to improve my performance
>>> or not.
>>>
>>> There is no solution with ISC DHCP. I doubt you'll find other suitable
>>> alternatives, but you're free to try of course.
>>>
>>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
>>>
>>>
>> One thing to try is to have more range statements in the block, like:
>>
>> subnet 192.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
>> {
>>     range 192.0.0.1 192.127.255.255;
>>     range 192.128.0.0 192.255.255.255;
>> }
>>
>> Best regards
>> Andreas
>>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPS9%2BStCqGx20rUWyUkQOUX44po6speAoD0tPmc3YtWNvbxa3Q>