Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 22:47:42 -0700 From: "Kahn" <kahn@home.com> To: "Joe Schwartz" <rjoe@sierrahill.com>, <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: routing issue Message-ID: <004201bd9e6a$73288800$4800a8c0@ERIN.UNET.TM>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You cannot route the class B of 192.168.xxx.xxx, However you can use natd to
run as an invisable proxie. The only problem is if you use a program like
ICQ on one of the clients, you will have to add in a socks 5 proxie to.
Erin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
We are Intel. Division is futile. You will be approximated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Schwartz <rjoe@sierrahill.com>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Monday, June 22, 1998 7:15 AM
Subject: routing issue
>
>Folks,
>
>I want to use a FreeBSD machine as an Internet host with 2
>ethernet cards. One card on an Internet subnet and the other
>card to service the internal private network.
>
>I'm having trouble getting it to route between the 2 interfaces.
>
>
>I have 3 machines setup for a test.
>
>machine a:
>----------
>ifconfig -a
>ep0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 207.8.11.165 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 207.8.11.167
> ether 00:a0:24:11:c7:19
>
>
>machine b:
>----------
>ifconfig -a
>ep0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 207.8.11.166 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 207.8.11.167
> ether 00:10:4b:29:aa:a7
>ep1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
> ether 00:10:4b:20:94:3a
>
>machine c:
>----------
>ifconfig -a
>ep0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
> ether 00:10:4b:29:ab:da
>
>
>
>machine a's default route is set to 207.8.11.166
>machine c's default route is set to 192.168.1.1
>
>machine b has a route between the 2 interfaces by issuing: (but doesn't
work)
>
>route add -net 192.168.1.0 207.8.11.166 0
>
>machine b can ping machine a and c
>
>machine a can ping:
>207.8.11.166 and 192.168.1.1 but not 192.168.1.2
>
>machine c can ping:
>192.168.1.1 and 207.8.11.166 but not 207.8.11.165
>
>==============================================================
>
>In /etc/rc.conf I've got:
>
>gateway_enable="YES"
>router_enable="YES"
>
>Machine b ISN'T routing between the 2 interfaces. Any suggestions?
> -----
>I have several machines set up like this for clients working perfectly
>under FreeBSD 2.1.x.
>
>Does FreeBSD 2.2.x expect a subtle difference somehow? Is my 'route add'
>command incorrect?
>
>HELP!!
>THANKS,
>
>Joe
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004201bd9e6a$73288800$4800a8c0>