Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:09:03 +0100
From:      Laurent Frigault <lfrigault@agneau.org>
To:        Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org>
Cc:        freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/121668: connect randomly fails with EPERM with some pf rules
Message-ID:  <20080314210903.GA20532@obelix.bergerie.agneau.org>
In-Reply-To: <32006.194.74.82.3.1205485356.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org>
References:  <200803132330.m2DNU3iG042764@freefall.freebsd.org> <32006.194.74.82.3.1205485356.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:02:36AM +0100, Remko Lodder wrote:
 
> Why are you filtering on your local IP stack anyway? filtering on lo0
> is not that common, or at least in my point of view not used often and
> presents problems all the way.

I don't. It was just a way to provide a simple case to reproduce the
problem.

I have seen rare case when filtering local traffic was needed to enforce
multi-jail isolations.

Usualy, I just have a stateless quick rule that allow everything on
lo0 at the beginning of the ruleset before the default block log  quick
all at the end


-- 
Laurent Frigault | <url:http://www.agneau.org/>;



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080314210903.GA20532>