Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Feb 1997 14:33:58 -0800 (PST)
From:      Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To:        Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
Cc:        Joe Greco <jgreco@solaria.sol.net>, "David E. Cross" <dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2.2 Stability (was Re: another victim..)
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.94.970219142926.2321A-100000@misery.sdf.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970220083130.10199C-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 20 Feb 1997, Michael Hancock wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Feb 1997, Joe Greco wrote:
> 
> > On the other hand, 2.1.X has been proven by time and fire to be a STABLE
> > and RELIABLE OS.  My Web server is setting site uptime records:
> > 
> >  2:39PM  up 195 days, 23:22, 1 user, load averages: 0.21, 0.18, 0.15
> 
> I've been running 2.2 since it was "current" with apache for 5 months and
> it's *never* fallen over.  The longest uptime was around 65 days, but that
> was because it was taken down for kernel updates. 
>
> The web serving load isn't very high though, httpd is generating about
> 30MB of logs every month. 

  That isn't very much.  I've got a 2.1-stable system running for 114 days
that accumulates a 150 MB of logs every month, and web serving isn't even
its primary service:  DNS and mail are.  It provides DNS service for over
400 domains. 

> Regards,
>
> 
> Mike Hancock

Tom
  
> > In the meantime, there are those of us who are beating the snot (sorry
> > for the Karlism) out of 2.2, and it is looking very promising.  Hopefully
> > it can "prove" itself and take over for 2.1.7 within the next year.  But
> > I am not going to put all of MY eggs in the 2.2 basket, until I am 
> > confident that the basket is strong, and was well built, based on firsthand
> > experience.
> > 
> > That's why you might wish to install 2.1.7.  It's basically a matter of
> > faith and reliability.
> > 
> > If you're looking for a desktop OS?  Then the picture might be different.
> > 2.2 should offer enough of an incentive to go that way that you may choose
> > to install 2.2.
> > 
> > ... Joe
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Joe Greco - Systems Administrator			      jgreco@ns.sol.net
> > Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI			   414/342-4847
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.94.970219142926.2321A-100000>