Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:45:24 +0300
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To:        swell.k@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ed Schouten <ed@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Inserting flow-control chars with an mpsafetty kernel
Message-ID:  <878wuk3sq3.fsf@kobe.laptop>
In-Reply-To: <86abf0xazp.fsf@gmail.com> (swell k.'s message of "Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:38:02 %2B0400")
References:  <87fxot5hoi.fsf@kobe.laptop> <86myj0xdou.fsf@gmail.com> <8763po58y9.fsf@kobe.laptop> <86abf0xazp.fsf@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:38:02 +0400, swell.k@gmail.com wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> writes:
>> Yes.  I was using screen when I tried this.  Now that I tried outside
>> of screen, C-s and C-q work in Emacs and ^V^S or ^V^Q works in
>> /usr/bin/vi.
>>
>> Is this a known bug of screen?  Are there already patches floating
>> around to fix it?
>
> I don't know. What I know that it was way before mpsafetty was merged
> in -current. It didn't really bother me to verify and report it since
> I don't use non-windowed Emacs often enough. But from my observation
> ^S/^Q do work in copy mode and it still present in screen.git too and
> didn't fixed in mpsafetty-20080824.diff.gz.
>
> So it's just `me too', sorry.

Fair enough, thanks for the tip about screen.  At least now I know where
to look for more details :D




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?878wuk3sq3.fsf>