Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 16:55:32 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp>, Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAO Integration? Message-ID: <199812110755.QAA10039@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Dec 1998 17:01:56 PST." <199812110101.RAA01409@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Second, PAO enhanced irq-pool, dynamic irq-pool. So, pccardd get > free-irq from kernel. >> This is an example of an unacceptable solution rerettably typical to >> the PAO project - you folks are *too*narrowly*focussed* on your needs. It seems to me that the two parties don't communicate well. The new-bus people talk from the view of the entire architecture, but the focus of the PAO people is how to face the reality *NOW*. There are too many problematic laptops, pc-cards and bioses. Many people, especially in Japan, need a solution that works now. PAO is admittedly a collection of workarounds built from a huge knowledgebase of everyday-laptop-users. But these problems can't be solved just from a clean design. The two parties should respect differences in their positions. I for one feel that both efforts are very important for laptop users. --Kenjiro To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812110755.QAA10039>