Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:00:07 +0000
From:      "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "<freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option
Message-ID:  <292A7F25-54E1-4795-867F-7B3D3D031319@fisglobal.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F4B5ED3.5090508@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4F26CC5A.2070501@FreeBSD.org> <4F4B5ED3.5090508@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Feb 27, 2012, at 2:45 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> on 30/01/2012 18:59 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>=20
>> First, I think that this proposal/discussion could have been more useful=
 before
>> the 9.0.  Maybe the RE would be interested in adding another item to the=
ir
>> pre-release checklist: ask developers about what could be dropped and wh=
at should
>> be added to the Safe Mode settings in a new (.0) release.  Probably the =
developers
>> should keep the Safe Mode in mind too when adding new features or making=
 other
>> drastic changes, but the reminder should be welcome.
> [snip]
>> o Since we have a separate ACPI option and because ACPI now is almost a =
mandatory
>> thing (and not a significant source of boot troubles), maybe we could re=
move the
>> code that automatically disables ACPI in Safe Mode?
>>=20
>> o hint.apic.0.disabled - APIC code doesn't seem to be a significant sour=
ce of boot
>> troubles, like ACPI it has become almost a mandatory thing.  So maybe we=
 should
>> remove this setting?
> [dropped proposals snipped]
>> o hw.eisa_slot - Looks like something from ancient times.  Probably just
>> irrelevant for most systems.
>>=20
>> o hint.kbdmux.0.disabled - I do not recall any recent problems with kbdm=
ux.  In
>> fact disabling it may produce a surprising behavior for a user if there =
are
>> multiple keyboards actually attached.
>>=20
>> Just so that the Safe Mode doesn't turn into a NOP I propose to add the =
following
>> tunables:
>>=20
>> o kern.eventtimer.periodic=3D1 - Use periodic timer to drive clocks just=
 in case a
>> system has any problems with the default mode.  Example: PR 164457.
>>=20
>> o kern.geom.part.check_integrity=3D0 - Let GPART code be more permissive=
, could be
>> useful during upgrades from earlier versions of FreeBSD or when multi-bo=
oting with
>> other OSes.
>>=20
>> o More?
>>=20
>=20
> How does the following look?
> diff --git a/sys/boot/forth/menu-commands.4th b/sys/boot/forth/menu-comma=
nds.4th
> index 828a148..41ba317 100644
> --- a/sys/boot/forth/menu-commands.4th
> +++ b/sys/boot/forth/menu-commands.4th
> @@ -62,30 +62,19 @@ marker task-menu-commands.4th
>    -rot 2dup 12 + c! rot    \ replace 'N' with ASCII numeral
>=20
>    evaluate 0=3D if
> -        s" hint.apic.0.disabled" unsetenv
>        s" hw.ata.ata_dma" unsetenv
>        s" hw.ata.atapi_dma" unsetenv
>        s" hw.ata.wc" unsetenv
> -        s" hw.eisa_slots" unsetenv
> -        s" hint.kbdmux.0.disabled" unsetenv
> +        s" kern.eventtimer.periodic" unsetenv
> +        s" kern.geom.part.check_integrity" unsetenv
> +        s" debug.acpi.disabled" unsetenv
>    else
> -        \
> -        \ Toggle ACPI elements if necessary
> -        \
> -        acpipresent? if acpienabled? if
> -            menuacpi @ dup 0<> if
> -                toggle_menuitem ( N -- N )
> -            then
> -            drop
> -            acpi_disable
> -        then then
> -
> -        s" set hint.apic.0.disabled=3D1" evaluate
>        s" set hw.ata.ata_dma=3D0" evaluate
>        s" set hw.ata.atapi_dma=3D0" evaluate
>        s" set hw.ata.wc=3D0" evaluate
> -        s" set hw.eisa_slots=3D0" evaluate
> -        s" set hint.kbdmux.0.disabled=3D1" evaluate
> +        s" set kern.eventtimer.periodic=3D1" unsetenv
> +        s" set kern.geom.part.check_integrity=3D0" unsetenv
> +        s" set debug.acpi.disabled=3Dhostres" unsetenv
>    then
>=20
>    menu-redraw
>=20
>=20

The reasoning is sound and diff looks good.

+1 BUT... testing warranted and feedback from others should also be sought-=
after for consensus.

Good work.
--=20
Devin

_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia=
l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an=
d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma=
nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware=
 that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie=
w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?292A7F25-54E1-4795-867F-7B3D3D031319>