Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:27:31 -0700 From: bmah@FreeBSD.org (Bruce A. Mah) To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org>, The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted! Message-ID: <200210222027.g9MKRVlx038078@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20021022201704.GB17612@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <15328.1035268433@critter.freebsd.dk> <20021022195314.GE3492@xtanbul.espresso-com.com> <200210222007.g9MK7oPO037800@intruder.bmah.org> <20021022201704.GB17612@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-1115413338P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Steve Kargl wrote: > I've noticed many commits on cvs-all include an "Approved by: re" > line, but I haven't seen an official code slush/freeze announcement. Feature freeze started 16 October. New feature commits (as opposed to bugfix or doc commits) should have RE approval. > Is RE going to request a code freeze around 10 Nov.? Clearly we're not adhering to the last published code-freeze date; according to that, we would have been in code-freeze for two days already. The more src-oriented members of RE are probably in a better position than I am to say when code-freeze is going to start. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1115413338P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQE9tbSz2MoxcVugUsMRAnSiAKD3yxshh+UFZpFmMfPAdP7h0jimigCfUgcu wxJz/+wETttMRN+H5ESkpqY= =nLtn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1115413338P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210222027.g9MKRVlx038078>