Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:19:08 -0500 From: Aniruddha Bohra <bohra@cs.rutgers.edu> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: vivek@CS.Princeton.EDU Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD Message-ID: <3F9C1E2C.50409@cs.rutgers.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031026121527.K2023@odysseus.silby.com> References: <1066789354.21430.39.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <1066816287.25609.34.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <1066820436.25609.93.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <1067183332.3f9bece4c0cf4@webmail.cs.princeton.edu> <20031026121527.K2023@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > As always, you're seeing the lack of available committer time, not a real > lack of interest. One way to accelerate the process might be for someone > (not necessarily you, any reader of this mailing list could do it) to show > that this change visibly benefits some easy to run benchmark. Some simple > setup of apachebench vs thttpd (which uses sendfile, afaik) would be > useful for this purpose. I think he said in the mail that they are setting a record for SPEC Web benchmarking numbers. I think it is a very visible and referred to benchmark as far as web servers go, and it would be (800/600) as compared to the best linux webserver. I think it is proof enough. Would be fun to have the best SPEC number from FreeBSD and a university and not Linux and some industrial giant :) Thanks Aniruddha
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F9C1E2C.50409>