Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:38:01 +0000 From: Pegasus Mc Cleaft <ken@mthelicon.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern+world / ports make options Message-ID: <201004251838.01073.ken@mthelicon.com> In-Reply-To: <20100425111740.GI92627@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <201004241642.38017.ken@mthelicon.com> <20100425111740.GI92627@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 25 April 2010 11:17:40 Ulrich Sp=C3=B6rlein wrote:
> On Sat, 24.04.2010 at 16:42:37 +0000, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > It may already be implemented, but it would be nice if there was
> > something defined while the kernel and/or world is being built to that a
> > nested block of ifdefs can select which env variables to be set.
>=20
> src.conf has already been mentioned, I don't use it myself but have the
> following set in make.conf
>=20
> .if ${.CURDIR:M*/usr/ports/*}
> NOCLEANDEPENDS=3D true
> WRKDIRPREFIX=3D /usr/obj
> .include "/etc/ports.conf"
> .endif
Hi Ulrich,=20
Thank you for that. This is pretty much what I was looking for as I can=20
use the .if block to add in only the pieces I want. The src.conf solution w=
as=20
an option, but since both make.conf and src.conf are called, I ended up=20
basically undoing everything in src.conf that I did in make.conf; and that=
=20
didn't work so well as I kept breaking the build (couldn't find headers and=
=20
all sorts of thing). No doubt, it was the way that I did it.. Your solution=
is=20
cleaner and makes sense to me.=20
Thanks again,=20
Peg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201004251838.01073.ken>