Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:11:26 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> Cc: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best archiver? (for music) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903151010200.40993@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090315080541.GB16322@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20090313191520.GA14233@thought.org> <20090313202226.GA47453@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903132128460.33043@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090314030558.GB25027@thought.org> <20090314072602.GA75036@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090315035101.GA28705@thought.org> <20090315080541.GB16322@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If you're not an expert you should probably stick with one of the > --preset modes. E.g. '--preset medium' or '--preset standard'. That will > give you variable bitrate files with good quality. lame -h -V 3 is what i use. > The speakers in telephones are tiny. That's probably a large part of it. > > The codec used to digitize voice signals for current DECT phones, G.726 > [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.726] dates from 1990, so it was limited > to the technology of that time. Modern codecs like speex probably do a > better job! MUCH better. record your voice at 8kHz and then try speex. it's REALLY excellent.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903151010200.40993>