Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rick Hamell <hamellr@aracnet.com>
To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>
Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: HARDWARE.TXT vs. {i386,alpha}/RELNOTES.TXT
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008301034560.7538-100000@shell1.aracnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20000830192928.A95505@mithrandr.moria.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > So, it seems like what we ought to do is to sync up HARDWARE.TXT with > > RELNOTES.TXT (to make sure there's one consistent list), and then > > replace the hardware lists in RELNOTES.TXT with pointers to > > HARDWARE.TXT. Anyone we need to ask about this? > > I've noticed this before too. My only suggestion is that we should > continue to document _new_ support in RELNOTES. I thought RELNOTES referenced any NEW hardware in that release, while HARDWARE refrenced ALL supported hardware...? The pointers would be a good idea, most people are only wanting to go to one place. Rick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0008301034560.7538-100000>