Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Aug 2002 00:39:55 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Chris Knight <chris@aims.com.au>, re@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Comments on Release Building for -current
Message-ID:  <20020802073955.GA88247@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020802041414.A3616-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
References:  <20020801173513.GC82778@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020802041414.A3616-100000@gamplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:20:53AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> I wouldn't trust -O2 for releases without lots of testing in -current
> (and not updating the compiler after testing).

The rest of the GCC using world can use -O2 on their code.  We are the
only ones that have so much trouble with it.  It is probably due to our
bugs, not GCC's.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020802073955.GA88247>