Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 15:44:59 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: FreeBSD hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: kern_mib.c:int securelevel = -1; Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960811153833.1847B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199608100845.KAA07623@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 Aug 1996, J Wunsch wrote: > As Michael Hancock wrote: > > > Please use INSECURE to be consistent with BSD/OS and NetBSD. I'm for > > names in code that are black and white. The man pages can describe the > > gray areas in the bugs or caveats section. > > ...and make it a default option. Otherwise, people with typical > workstations running Xservers will jump at us. The comment in LINT > and GENERIC _must_ mention this, or the amount of support replies we > have to send out will increase drastically. I'm all for making it the default too. I guess there will be a period of "I can't write to xxx, why?" with "Didn't you read current, damn it?" responses that we'd have to go through. Otherwise it will probably become a long forgotten feature. Mike Hancock
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960811153833.1847B-100000>