Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 05:07:27 -0700 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@freebsd.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/stty extern.h gfmt.c key.c print.c stty.c stty.h Message-ID: <20000428050727.A25432@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20000428044403.B17180@freebsd.org>; from ache@freebsd.org on Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 04:44:03AM -0700 References: <200004272131.OAA15690@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004281529170.2967-100000@alphplex.bde.org> <20000428044403.B17180@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 04:44:03AM -0700, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > I disagree. There is no harm to implement it here too, better to have all > tty-related stuff in one place to see whole picture on what happens with > tty. I.e. whole state of all things can be changed. It is not This point based on presupposition that drainwait is general-tty related and not COM-specific, as I clarify in my previous message. It means that comcontrol should not be removed since it control not only general-tty drainwait but COM-specific DTRwait too. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> http://nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000428050727.A25432>