Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:31:24 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player Message-ID: <20091004053123.GA37100@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <4AC70238.1000209@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <28f938b10910021725p7e615617xf21639d3fb7fcc9d@mail.gmail.com> <4AC6A26E.9080405@gmail.com> <4297a9020910021815p60858505w89abbfa909b99340@mail.gmail.com> <20091003045640.GA28502@guilt.hydra> <5a3c8f450910022228k3c196b6ay1acc3031716d673d@mail.gmail.com> <4AC70238.1000209@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:50:16AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >=20 > Google apparently favours HTML-5 as their future direction, rather than > Flash. And where YouTube goes, the rest of the world will surely follow, > at least as far as Video streaming is concerned. Oh, thank goodness. Flash video is a blight. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkrIMysACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVhIQCfZSXgqP+e4sI8GaYJU1KwTw40 RZcAn0OE0Up53c31QySNoJ+XUN+CqwmP =Ygi1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091004053123.GA37100>