Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:46:36 -0800 (PST)
From:      Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com>
To:        Gary Geisbert <ggeisbert@e-centives.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: qmail IO problems
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSO.4.21.0102051546070.18264-100000@gandalf.bravenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A7F27E1.5C5B5C0@e-centives.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

well tried that.....now qmail-qstat take a very long time to return queue
numbers now...and not much has changed!



On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Gary Geisbert wrote:

> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 17:23:29 -0500
> From: Gary Geisbert <ggeisbert@e-centives.com>
> To: Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: qmail IO problems
> 
> Dan Phoenix wrote:
> > 
> > I/O. Checking on qmail queue patches maybe? Far as I know there is a
> > big-to do patch on qmail's homesite....not sure if that will help but
> 
> Definately go for the big-todo patch -- depending on the size of your
> average queue, you will see a very considerable performance gain.  The
> problem you're seeing is because of the large number of files per
> directory in /var/qmail/queue/todo.  Changing conf-split to be ~500,
> alongside the big-todo patch will yield far better performance.
> 
> ~Gary
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSO.4.21.0102051546070.18264-100000>