Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Jun 2010 15:05:02 -0400
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org>
To:        bf1783@gmail.com
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Our aging base system heimdal
Message-ID:  <19467.61790.690469.182207@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik213g_8W2ocr3mCCb2EED8RBXsYBavdYll1PI_@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTik213g_8W2ocr3mCCb2EED8RBXsYBavdYll1PI_@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:41:59 +0000, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> said:

> Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
> largely untouched since May 2008?

I would love for it to go away entirely, and those base-system
components that depend on it to learn how to use either Kerberos
implementation from ports.  (I'd also love for the ancient and broken
base version of libcom_err to go away -- there's no knob to turn it
off, and the shared library conflicts with ports/krb5.)

(And yes, this is a bit of an irony considering that I used to be the
maintainer of the base-system Kerberos code in the long-ago krb4
days.  But my job requires me to administer MIT Kerberos, so I need
the MIT kadmin utility and not the Heimdal one.)

-GAWollman




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19467.61790.690469.182207>