Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:25:56 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: attilio@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-new-bus@freebsd.org, scottl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Collapsing device_state_t with devinfo_state_t Message-ID: <20091108.182556.1680365520.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10911080854x64d18e40hf639634e625dd11b@mail.gmail.com> References: <3bbf2fe10911080853qad0057w490694e5627681fe@mail.gmail.com> <3bbf2fe10911080854x64d18e40hf639634e625dd11b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <3bbf2fe10911080854x64d18e40hf639634e625dd11b@mail.gmail.com>
Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> writes:
: 2009/11/8 Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>:
: > This patch should collpase device_state_t with devinfo_state_t and
: > remove a bogus replication of this struct:
: > http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/devinfo.diff
:
: Sorry, forgot to mention:
: I thought about adding _bus.h interface because I thought that
: devinfo.h wanted to avoid a namespace pollution, but that's not really
: the case as 85% of the bus.h is already under _KERNEL labels. That
: means the pollution is minimal and restricted to 1-2 further structs.
I'm cool with this patch, and that decision.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091108.182556.1680365520.imp>