Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:08:14 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Lupe Christoph <lupe@lupe-christoph.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Challenge during the ports freeze Message-ID: <20050806160813.GA16439@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050806094330.GB2804@lupe-christoph.de> References: <20050804211547.GA678@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050805060115.GA20697@lupe-christoph.de> <200508051553.01031.lofi@freebsd.org> <20050806065912.GA2804@lupe-christoph.de> <20050806094330.GB2804@lupe-christoph.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 11:43:30AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Saturday, 2005-08-06 at 08:59:12 +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: >=20 > > I'll do that. There will have to be a new Munin release soon because of > > an incompatibility Tobi Oetiker introduced in RRDtool 1.2. I'll put > > support for PACKAGE_BUILDING building into the port then. >=20 > One more question: I can't find anything in /usr/ports/Mk that sets > PACKAGE_BUILDING. Can I safely assume that it is only set for testing > ports? Or are there situations when it is set and real packages are > produced? It's set "by hand" (in the controlling scripts) when building the packages on the automated cluster (pointyhat), which is used to produce packages for the FTP site, release builds, etc. > Another question: in the build process, will PACKAGE_BUILDING still be > set when the package is deleted? Yes. Kris --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC9OBtWry0BWjoQKURAoHmAKDQG0Wagsv5vzMSx9TwP29rVrbLngCfZLLb W/JNsYvndwfpSsMtV7xD1fM= =zqKT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050806160813.GA16439>