Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:42:11 +1000 From: Darren Reed <darrenr@freebsd.org> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ? Message-ID: <53D76C73.4010201@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1uHJn4xA-5zFr4fZez3FyXi7tT0LmhyR8yWkqG7k1A%2B=A@mail.gmail.com> References: <201407261843.s6QIhcx4008597@slippy.cwsent.com> <53D61AC6.5030305@freebsd.org> <CAN6yY1uHJn4xA-5zFr4fZez3FyXi7tT0LmhyR8yWkqG7k1A%2B=A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29/07/2014 8:07 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: ... > And all IPv6 NAT is evil and should be cast into (demonic residence > of your choosing) on sight! For the most part, I agree with you but the problem is "checkbox" comparisons. That IPv6 shouldn't be NAT'd is why I didn't implement it for such a long time. However given the problem that EIDs pose for privacy, I'm of the opinion that maybe NAT66 does have a place but not in the way that the NAT66 RFC prescribes. Darren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53D76C73.4010201>