Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:27:09 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        "Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] vnode bypass for devices: "ON" 
Message-ID:  <37414.1100586429@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:41:46 %2B1030." <20041116001146.GB56252@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20041116001146.GB56252@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au>, "Wilkinson, Ale
x" writes:
>Do u mind explaining what this actually means ? 
>
>I'm "assuming" we are now by-passing the vnode layer for performance reasons ?

yes.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37414.1100586429>