Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:48:32 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: Raaf <raaf@zen.mooo.com>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB2 device won't attach to ehci Message-ID: <46A5AED0.9020502@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20070724071114.GA1162@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <46A3D3CB.5070400@zen.mooo.com> <20070724071114.GA1162@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2007-Jul-23 00:01:47 +0200, Raaf <raaf@zen.mooo.com> wrote: >> Looking at the specifications page of the Olympus FE-210 i see >> USB 2.0 compatible Yes. >> >> http://www.olympus.co.uk/consumer/29_FE-210_Specifications.htm >> >> That usually means that it's really a USB1.x device, but marketing >> department decided that selling it as a USB 2.0 compatible device >> would probably be better for sales :-) > > I've done some experimenting and it appears to be true in this > case as well. I've checked on a different system running > Winbloze and it agrees that it's USB1 :-(. > > Looking further, it seems that the 'USB2' claim only exists in > some countries - presumably where that sort of claim doesn't > raise the ire of the relevant consumer protection body. > > Thanks for that pointer. Sorry for disturbing this list. Do not confuse high-speed with USB2. A slow device can still be USB2 compliant as USB2 still defines the slower speeds. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46A5AED0.9020502>