Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 May 2007 14:57:39 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Setting X11BASE
Message-ID:  <20070521185739.GA79660@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070521114932.pf1nvaa74kkwk4gk@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <46504986.1010205@netfence.it> <D18E5DEA208C2AA6714A7AB5@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <20070520202415.GA43326@xor.obsecurity.org> <76BFFE223D3D165D7F4283A3@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <20070521114932.pf1nvaa74kkwk4gk@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:49:32AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> (from Sun, 20 May 2007  
> 16:28:56 -0500):
> 
> >It would be nice if every port that you use on a headless system didn't
> >require xorg libraries, but I suppose that's unrealistic.
> 
> Add this to your make.conf:
> ---snip---
> WITHOUT_X11=yes
> NO_X11=yes        # needed in the past and maybe still needed
> ---snip---
> 
> Recompile every port you need which depends upon the x11 libs (e.g. gd  
> and php). Deinstall the x11 ports.
> 
> Better would be to put this into make.conf before installing any port,  
> this way no x11 libs should be pulled in as a dependency from the  
> beginning.

I think NO_X11 is a NOP.

Also WITHOUT_X11 will only disable X support in ports for which it is
optional.  Many (probably most) ports that require X cannot work
without it, and if such a port is either specified explicitly or
pulled in as a dependency then you'll get what you asked for.

Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070521185739.GA79660>