Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:47:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday Message-ID: <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com> <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Core should consider reverting the special rules that were originally > > created with the expectation of major breakage in 5.x back to > > the set of rules we had for 3.x and 4.x. > > I have no idea what special rules you are talking about for 4.x/5.x. > > 4.x-stable is a -stable tree and shall be treated as such. I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable branch (yet). That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004231947.NAA08296>