Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:48:28 +0430 From: s m <sam.gh1986@gmail.com> To: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Cc: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Olivier Nicole <olivier.nicole@cs.ait.ac.th>, sthaug@nethelp.no Subject: Re: how define network with mask 8 for dhcp server? Message-ID: <CAA_1SgF09WTmUbQbUPf-sxTd6iAySp%2BRr8a9bEB8rYG318bMGA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPS9%2BStCqGx20rUWyUkQOUX44po6speAoD0tPmc3YtWNvbxa3Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAA_1SgHWSwm62xsXzas7W0SOtDoLL-0o85%2BdqGeLzDbhb=KWQg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2Bg%2BBvhvo0Tx0XjyGw7fTV=aribbev1BEh8cUsVLWjxD2d62pg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA_1SgGJdt8h3-5naE32PuuWxX26NhiXietyOsh20Lf73pkrVQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130812.071303.74723582.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAPS9%2BStfwq309h641hiTGnav=bTWdr5HWdz4evpMqTx6mfx%2BgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA_1SgGck7Tne56p2yWS261rc6trR1QiDJ1kk-BbcfbDk5yRCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPS9%2BStCqGx20rUWyUkQOUX44po6speAoD0tPmc3YtWNvbxa3Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
yup, absolutely right:)
is there any way to improve performance??? do you have any suggestion?
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, thats another problem :) At least dhcpd doesn't crash and could
> deliver the full range of a /8 network.
>
> Best regards
> Andreas
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:00 AM, s m <sam.gh1986@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> thanks Andreas, but it can not help me. it uses all my RAM memory yet:(
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:13 AM, <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > you're right Olivier, but you know i have a user interface for dhcp
>>>> and i
>>>> > should handle all the network and ranges which are inserted by user
>>>> and
>>>> > logically are true. network with mask 8, logically is true and having
>>>> > million available ip address, too.
>>>> > i just wanna know if there is any solution to improve my performance
>>>> or not.
>>>>
>>>> There is no solution with ISC DHCP. I doubt you'll find other suitable
>>>> alternatives, but you're free to try of course.
>>>>
>>>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
>>>>
>>>>
>>> One thing to try is to have more range statements in the block, like:
>>>
>>> subnet 192.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
>>> {
>>> range 192.0.0.1 192.127.255.255;
>>> range 192.128.0.0 192.255.255.255;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>
>>
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAA_1SgF09WTmUbQbUPf-sxTd6iAySp%2BRr8a9bEB8rYG318bMGA>