Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 21:57:48 +0000 (GMT) From: Saifi Khan <saifi.khan@twincling.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My FreeBSD-current/Xen install notes Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905192149580.6589@localhost> In-Reply-To: <d763ac660905190631p2ff604b0gaa12ee3026b91ebc@mail.gmail.com> References: <d763ac660905180553x5c7b3c5bq61acab3d28810a24@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905190807290.887@localhost> <d763ac660905182052t294e588bu593f1d660aef8b52@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0905190944510.1090@localhost> <d763ac660905190631p2ff604b0gaa12ee3026b91ebc@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > People seem to think "virtualisation" is "virtualisation". It isn't. > It depends on what kind(s) of problems you're trying to solve. Xen > solves a certain set of virtualisation problems. > Could you please share 'your insight' on the 'set of virtualization problems' that Xen solves ? thanks Saifi.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.64.0905192149580.6589>