Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 04:23:27 +0900 (JST) From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: please test Flash Plugin Wrapper for Flash6 Message-ID: <200310051923.h95JNRiR031328@sakura.ninth-nine.com> In-Reply-To: <1065380888.15483.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200310051833.h95IXgiR030095@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <1065380888.15483.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 15:08:08 -0400 Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote: > > Hi Flash Plugin Wrapper Users! > > Thanks for "Joe Kelsey" <joek@mail.flyingcroc.net>[1], "t3rra yi" > > <t3rra@hotmail.com>[2]. I supported flashpluginwrapper for Flash6, > > and I did independent browsers using /etc/libmap.conf > > (Thanks! > mdodd). > > [1] use linux-threads. > > [2] map libc.so.6 -> pluginwrapper.so > > No more LD_PRELOAD=pluginwrapper.so!! > > Not only mozilla!! > > http://tmp.ninth-nine.com/LinuxPluginWrapper/linuxpluginwrapper-20031006.tar.gz > > I am cheking for acrobat plugin, too. Now, Acrobat(plugin) is > > stable. But mozilla's UI is freeze:-(. > So this is only for -CURRENT? Yes. This feature needs libmap.conf on (only) -CURRENT. Subject: Re: /etc/libmap.conf MFC? Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 18:10:57 -0400 (EDT) on freebsd-stable@ mdodd said, You should upgrade to 5.1 if it has features that you want. Adding new features to the STABLE branch this late in its lifetime seems pointless.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310051923.h95JNRiR031328>