Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:49:28 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org> To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jail init, but another question Message-ID: <20090126114928.GB2944@screwed.box> In-Reply-To: <200901251706.15683.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <20090125113516.GB33731@screwed.box> <200901251706.15683.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You'll never silence the voice of the voiceless, Mel! Yes. Ruleset name did not resolve into the number. So rc.subr asked for a digit and I provided a number that way. It was too obvious for me to specify the 'devfsrules_' prefix for the case it cannot be anything other than devfs rules. And so it did not resolve by provided meaningful part ( e. g., 'example' ) of ruleset name only. Thanks! 2009/01/25 17:06:15 -0900 Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> => To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org : M> Something else is wrong. Set rc_debug="YES" in /etc/rc.conf then M> /etc/rc.d/jail start example M> to trace how the rulesets are evaluated. 73! Peter -- http://vereshagin.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090126114928.GB2944>