Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 18:24:54 -0600 (CST) From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@nomad.dataplex.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Heads up! /etc/rc.conf.site is dead. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902091801550.452-100000@nomad.dataplex.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902091716440.275-100000@nomad.dataplex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I understand the scaling issue. However, I like to keep related things in one place. Perhaps we need to move ALL the rc files into a common directory. As for the "read-only" argument, I recommend, for those who wish to separate them, symbolic links from the read only area to a writable area. When that is not important, keeping them together can have advantages. Please understand that I support the general direction of these changes. However, since it is just about the same effort to implement any of the proposals and the "status quo" has a big advantage, I think that it is important to discuss the implications of each of the stratagies before commiting to any of them. PS: The same applies to DHCP. Since some of the well respected "names" have also supported ISC-DHCP, I hope that we can reach a concensus before anyone is allowed to make their bias the "de-facto" answer. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9902091801550.452-100000>