Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:27:12 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.org> To: Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org> Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Richard Sharpe <sharpe@ns.aus.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011202152626.20064A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20011202121147.G92925-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Lamont Granquist wrote: : :What is the remaining bottleneck in these tests? CPU? Interrupts? What :would you need to do to get that closer to the theoretical limit :(something around 920 Mbs for GigE IIRC)? Well, for one thing, I'd imagine that per-byte and per-copy overheads still exist since we're not in a zero-copy environment. -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011202152626.20064A-100000>