Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 04:29:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: wong@rogerswave.ca Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, kpneal@pobox.com, terry@lambert.olg, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Divert sockets.. Message-ID: <199709100429.VAA10562@usr04.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970909204349.718B-100000@wong.rogerswave.ca> from "Ken Wong" at Sep 9, 97 08:45:50 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Sex would dictate that it would be neater if it worked between threads. > > if you mean kernel thread and the threads have their own pids. :( No. You obviously haven't heard my lament on kernel threads giving away quantum that belongs to the process when issuing blocking calls, or the unfair competition for non-threaded processes when the number of kernel threads is less than the number of user space threads. Rather than repeat myself, see the -hackers and -current list archives for "threads". Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709100429.VAA10562>