Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 03:18:56 -0500 (EST) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3c509b getting `eeprom failed to come ready' in current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.9911260317350.7305-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <2776.943604174@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <Pine.BSF.4.20.9911260006540.7305-100000@sasami.jurai.net>, "Matthew > N. Dodd" writes: > > >Yes, and when I converted if_ep to newbus I mentioned that hardwire was no > >longer supported. > > Couldn't we simply ignore such hardwiring (with a warning) if present ? I'm not sure that I can tell the difference between a hardwired device and one that is setup by the PnP/ISA 3c5x9 enumerator. I suppose I could cheat and init the softc in the IDENTIFY or something... > Can we somehow mark the if_ep as "fickle hardware" so it gets probed > before the if_ex/it_ie ? We used to have such a facility. I'm going to look closer at those two drivers and find the place where they disagree with if_ep. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | winter@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.9911260317350.7305-100000>